If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Life. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Life paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Life, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Life paper at affordable prices!
Downloading music
Dangerous?
&
Illegal?
Number of people participating in filesharing 00,000,000
Number of people that went to jail because of the RIAA 0
Number of people that had to pay a small fine to the RIAA 10
Number of filesharers hit by a car and died 10
Number of filesharers hit by lightning 4
Number of filesharers killed for no reason 10
Number of filesharers died of cancer 8100
Number of people that have died because of Sars 106
what is stealing?
legally its often that you have to actually pick it up and carry it away with you
#1
Compare copyrwite violation to stealing something from a shop, or another person.
If i were to steal a cd from a shop, that shop would loose that particular cd - they would not be able to sell it, AND they would have actually lost one of those copies.
when you commit a copywrite violation, (at least from the point of you acquiring a copy for yourself ) they still have their cd in the shop, which can be sold, they don't loose anything, they may not gain a sale of it to you. but there is a difference between that and actually making them loose something.
my point is there is a difference between loosing something and not gaining something.
#
I also think there is a significant moral difference between selling burnt cds and either downloading or uploading them, as selling the burnt cds your doing it for profit.
Consider this; unless you have a lot of money, you probably cant afford to buy all the stuff youve downloaded. So if you were not going to buy it anyway, they have not lost a sale to you.. in effect they have not lost anything in this example.
Im sure if you took a look at what you have downloaded, and that if you had to pay for it all, MUCH of it (not all, but at least a fair bit) you would not have. sure, some of the stuff you would have bought, but probably not most of it. and of course you may do a combination of buying things and downloading them.
of course this point doesnt excuse you for downloading something that you WOULD have bought.
#
who looses out? the creator - yes, (if and only if you would have bought it anyway).
but also the label (in the case of music) is the one that looses the most , since most of the profits go to the label.
Ill consider myself a Pirate before a theif
Are we theives? Did we steal anything? Should we go to jail?
No.
The music industry has prevailed... Im afraid its hard to deny, but they have indeed trapped the common consumer.
We have stolen nothing. Yes, people break the law when downloading copyrighted files, but the law itself is a trap. We dont steal from anyone. Its logically impossible to steal something that the artists never had. What are we doing? Stealing products? Nope... the producers still have a copy, and are making money, so I dont think we stole that... Are we stealing their money? Nope... last time I checked it was technically possible to steal something, unless someone actually had it at some point.
Where Im going with this is that the artists need to face it, theyre not losing money (or should I say, not gaining what they feel is enough) because of piracy. Its because of the fact that the content that theyre releasing simply wont sell. They rely far too much on their albums/movies/games to sell and make money, but when they dont, theyre quick to blame piracy, and its effects... Do the industries really gain satisfaction by suing people individually one by one? Of course not.
As a pp (person to person file sharing) advocate, I still do go to movie theaters to see films Im eager to see. I do buy DVDs that I want to watch. And I even occasionally buy albums that I want to listen to. Everything Ive downloaded, I didnt want to buy, because I felt that the money involved in paying for it wasnt worth it.
If I buy a DVD, I might show my family or friends, and movie organizations might claim due to my actions they lost potential sales because my family members or friends didnt pay to see the movie.
The bottom line is, at no time do I make any money that could have reached the movie organizations.
Kazaa is the same. So what if you want to lend a DVD file to your friend from Portugal who you have never met, or talked to. The bottom line is, there was no money made.
I know that there was duplication of the product but is it illegal to make copies of CDs you brought for the purpose of back up? Is it then illegal to lend these to unreliable friends who never return them?
Creating a backup of something you have already bought is morally okay.
(surely there's no argument there). this doesnt stop some of the content creators from making this difficult however.
By buying something you are essentially buying the rights to that information - this applies to the above, and also to the idea that if say you purchased something on VHS why should you have to pay again to have it on DVD - since your only getting a higher quality copy of something youve already bought the rights to (and were told its just as wrong to commit a copywrite even if the mp or whatever is low quality rather than high quality). so this is morally okay as well
Taping stuff off the radio, recording stuff off tv,etc.. i believe these are technically illegal too, if the content you are recording is copywrited. morally wrong? well i doubt too many people look down upon this sort of behaviors.
The same people fighting against mps ,pp networks, creating the DCMA law, etc are essentially the same groups (or modern day versions of) similar organizations who were against things like
VCRs
Cassette recorders (we were told this would be the death of music!)
Even radio (eg allowing songs to be played on radio)
-All of these things have unquestionably ended up benefiting (overall) the content creators - by a lot. This doesnt prove that mps will boost their profits, and they may well do the opposite. but I don't think it will be as bad as the horror story they say it will be.
now consider the above copywrite violations, and compare that to the 1 year old girl living in public housing who was targeted by RIAA. Clearly she would not have been able to afford that music (or not much of it) so she has not even caused them to not gain money from her. but her family would be doing it tough with trying to pay that $,000 settlement, surely that's hurt her family more, than RIAA loosing the sale of the two cds she might have been able to buy.
Hurt to riaa x cost of cd (minor for wealthy artists and wealthy recording industry) hurt to her family $,000. probably theyll have trouble paying their bills and just getting by.
and why is it that you can get a 50,000 USD fine, and/or like 5 years imprisonment (these are the max penalties), for one, non commercial copywrite violation????
the max penalties for actually stealing the cd from the shop (surely something far worse!) is far less than that.
Putting someone's life in danger for a rd time drink driving offense would be less too.
so there we have it, a legal system where (in theory) the safety of peoples lives are rated less than the cost of one track from a cd.. now that is immoral!!
(one would hope any sane judge would never impose anything even close to the max penalties for one extremely minor copywrite law of course)
In my view, non commercial copywrite violations, the max penalty should be more like the cost of the work multiplied by two (and that is the max penalty). obviously if youre out selling burnt cds the max penalty should be a lot more than that however (this would be a commercial copywrite violation)
The punishment should fit the crime! (this doesnt imply an eye for an eye type justice - only that a minor crime deserves a minor punishment, and a major crime deserves a major punishment)
creating a copy of an mp (one track from a cd is about a dollar or in value in loss to the copywrite owner - if you would have bought it had you not been able to copy it), and that is very Fucking minor indeed (certainly not deserving of a quater of a million dollar fine per violation!)
Please note that this sample paper on Life is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Life, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Life will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
